Revision e9ba4032a2568ef5b360de95eb6e09195a1b2efd authored by Maarten Lankhorst on 17 July 2017, 11:13:55 UTC, committed by Daniel Vetter on 27 July 2017, 20:07:29 UTC
ddb_allocation && ddb_allocation / blocks_per_line >= 1 is the same
as ddb_allocation >= blocks_per_line, so use the latter to simplify
this.

This fixes the following compiler warning:

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:4467]: (warning) Comparison of a
boolean expression with an integer other than 0 or 1.

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Fixes: d555cb5827d6 ("drm/i915/skl+: use linetime latency if ddb size is not available")
Cc: "Mahesh Kumar" <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>
Reported-by: David Binderman <dcb314@hotmail.com>
Cc: David Binderman <dcb314@hotmail.com>
Cc: <drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org> # v4.13-rc1+
Reviewed-by: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit 54d20ed1fff23c7d2633f01fc788111bf9c51c5d)
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170717111355.4523-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
1 parent 7b98da6
Raw File
percpu-rw-semaphore.txt
====================
Percpu rw semaphores
====================

Percpu rw semaphores is a new read-write semaphore design that is
optimized for locking for reading.

The problem with traditional read-write semaphores is that when multiple
cores take the lock for reading, the cache line containing the semaphore
is bouncing between L1 caches of the cores, causing performance
degradation.

Locking for reading is very fast, it uses RCU and it avoids any atomic
instruction in the lock and unlock path. On the other hand, locking for
writing is very expensive, it calls synchronize_rcu() that can take
hundreds of milliseconds.

The lock is declared with "struct percpu_rw_semaphore" type.
The lock is initialized percpu_init_rwsem, it returns 0 on success and
-ENOMEM on allocation failure.
The lock must be freed with percpu_free_rwsem to avoid memory leak.

The lock is locked for read with percpu_down_read, percpu_up_read and
for write with percpu_down_write, percpu_up_write.

The idea of using RCU for optimized rw-lock was introduced by
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>.
The code was written by Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
back to top