Revision eb5a8c06dde5c6b470e7b5dc5aa044cd647005a0 authored by Zhichao Cao on 04 December 2020, 22:57:29 UTC, committed by Facebook GitHub Bot on 04 December 2020, 22:58:37 UTC
Summary: In error_handler auto recovery case, if recovery_in_prog_ is false, the recover is finished or failed. In this case, the auto recovery thread should finish its execution so recovery_thread_ should be null. However, in some cases, it is not null, the caller should not directly returned. Instead, it should wait for a while and create a new thread to execute the new recovery. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7700 Test Plan: make check, error_handler_fs_test Reviewed By: anand1976 Differential Revision: D25098233 Pulled By: zhichao-cao fbshipit-source-id: 5a1cba234ca18f6dd5d1be88e02d66e1d5ce931b
1 parent 70f2e09
ROCKSDB_LITE.md
# RocksDBLite
RocksDBLite is a project focused on mobile use cases, which don't need a lot of fancy things we've built for server workloads and they are very sensitive to binary size. For that reason, we added a compile flag ROCKSDB_LITE that comments out a lot of the nonessential code and keeps the binary lean.
Some examples of the features disabled by ROCKSDB_LITE:
* compiled-in support for LDB tool
* No backupable DB
* No support for replication (which we provide in form of TransactionalIterator)
* No advanced monitoring tools
* No special-purpose memtables that are highly optimized for specific use cases
* No Transactions
When adding a new big feature to RocksDB, please add ROCKSDB_LITE compile guard if:
* Nobody from mobile really needs your feature,
* Your feature is adding a lot of weight to the binary.
Don't add ROCKSDB_LITE compile guard if:
* It would introduce a lot of code complexity. Compile guards make code harder to read. It's a trade-off.
* Your feature is not adding a lot of weight.
If unsure, ask. :)
Computing file changes ...
