https://github.com/torvalds/linux
Revision fedc1ed0f11be666de066b0c78443254736a942e authored by Linus Torvalds on 31 March 2014, 00:26:08 UTC, committed by Linus Torvalds on 31 March 2014, 00:26:08 UTC
Pull vfs fixes from Al Viro:
 "Switch mnt_hash to hlist, turning the races between __lookup_mnt() and
  hash modifications into false negatives from __lookup_mnt() (instead
  of hangs)"

On the false negatives from __lookup_mnt():
 "The *only* thing we care about is not getting stuck in __lookup_mnt().
  If it misses an entry because something in front of it just got moved
  around, etc, we are fine.  We'll notice that mount_lock mismatch and
  that'll be it"

* 'for-linus-2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs:
  switch mnt_hash to hlist
  don't bother with propagate_mnt() unless the target is shared
  keep shadowed vfsmounts together
  resizable namespace.c hashes
2 parent s 01358e5 + 38129a1
Raw File
Tip revision: fedc1ed0f11be666de066b0c78443254736a942e authored by Linus Torvalds on 31 March 2014, 00:26:08 UTC
Merge branch 'for-linus-2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs
Tip revision: fedc1ed
io_ordering.txt
On some platforms, so-called memory-mapped I/O is weakly ordered.  On such
platforms, driver writers are responsible for ensuring that I/O writes to
memory-mapped addresses on their device arrive in the order intended.  This is
typically done by reading a 'safe' device or bridge register, causing the I/O
chipset to flush pending writes to the device before any reads are posted.  A
driver would usually use this technique immediately prior to the exit of a
critical section of code protected by spinlocks.  This would ensure that
subsequent writes to I/O space arrived only after all prior writes (much like a
memory barrier op, mb(), only with respect to I/O).

A more concrete example from a hypothetical device driver:

        ...
CPU A:  spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_lock, flags)
CPU A:  val = readl(my_status);
CPU A:  ...
CPU A:  writel(newval, ring_ptr);
CPU A:  spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_lock, flags)
        ...
CPU B:  spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_lock, flags)
CPU B:  val = readl(my_status);
CPU B:  ...
CPU B:  writel(newval2, ring_ptr);
CPU B:  spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_lock, flags)
        ...

In the case above, the device may receive newval2 before it receives newval,
which could cause problems.  Fixing it is easy enough though:

        ...
CPU A:  spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_lock, flags)
CPU A:  val = readl(my_status);
CPU A:  ...
CPU A:  writel(newval, ring_ptr);
CPU A:  (void)readl(safe_register); /* maybe a config register? */
CPU A:  spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_lock, flags)
        ...
CPU B:  spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_lock, flags)
CPU B:  val = readl(my_status);
CPU B:  ...
CPU B:  writel(newval2, ring_ptr);
CPU B:  (void)readl(safe_register); /* maybe a config register? */
CPU B:  spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_lock, flags)

Here, the reads from safe_register will cause the I/O chipset to flush any
pending writes before actually posting the read to the chipset, preventing
possible data corruption.
back to top