Revision fff92e003922b655676e2e1bd6dd9a7a67ba0ee9 authored by Laurent Rineau on 01 June 2018, 15:16:17 UTC, committed by Laurent Rineau on 01 June 2018, 15:16:17 UTC
Triangulation_23: fix wrong return type in spatial_sort functor
TODO
- recuperer le dernier objet insere dans geomview
- pouvoir detruire des objets
- avoir une option pour que les segments soient des petits cylindres,
pour qu'on puisse enfin faire des demos 3D...
- INPUT BUG : not really fixed : if it takes long to run geomview (eg the
first time you run the program), then the bug is still there.
Try to fix it properly with select().
It's still probably a bug in Geomview.
- The remote geomview (with rsh) facility probably doesn't work.
But is it useful ?
- Missing operators (for 2d and 3d Voronoi diagrams) :
- Ray_[23], Line_[23] : an easy one is already there, but to do it
perfectly, we should draw the segment resulting from the intersection of
the object with the BBox.
- Circle_2
- Discretisation for Sphere and Circle should be configurable for the stream.
- Is there a way to see edges like cylinders somewhat (possibly generate them
ourselves), so that we know which one is in front of which other one ?
- For T3D : I want to be able to tell Geomview or the CGAL program to stop
displaying a tetrahedron that I select, so that I can see the inside.
Maybe it's not really worth it, finally. See the real needs first.
- I also want to display only the convex hull of a T3D.
- See how we can use this as a debugger : ask Frederic details on his stuff.
The fact we're multiprocess probably means we'll even have less problems
than multi-threads...
- Should wired_flag be checked for Triangle_[23] and other kernel stuff ?
Color:
------
- Color is not passed correctly to triangulations, and probably other kernel
objects. That must be checked, along with transparency.
- See how we can mix the Color output with the raw mode.
Currently it's not clear to me.
Check how to do transparency with Geomview ?
(passing the one from CGAL::Color)
Demo :
------
- Add demo files for polyhedrons ?
Doc:
---
- Monique's comment :
> > Also note that terrains are supported directly.
>
> Je comprends mal cette remarque:
> Soit c'est trop court et il faut expliquer que tout ca c'est template et que
> la sortie en tient compte et que donc ca marche bien, et pas que pour les
> terrains, les terrains ne sont qu'un exemple (important il est vrai, mais
> bon) de ce qu'on peut faire comme Triangulation_2 un peu speciale, quand il
> y aura des triangulations de surfaces ca marchera pareil.
> Soit c'est trop long, si tout ca est bien evident autant ne pas le dire.
> qu'en penses-tu ?
Medite bien, tu me raconteras.
Ce qu'il faudrait dire qq part c'est que ces sorties en marcheront que si
l'utilisateur a defini des sorties geomview pour les points, les segments,
les triangles et le tetraedres qu'il fournit dans la Traits.
C'est peut-etre dans la doc de Triangulation_2,3 qu'il faut l'ecrire ?
pourquoi ne pas l'ecrire aussi dans la doc geomview ?
![swh spinner](/static/img/swh-spinner.gif)
Computing file changes ...