Revision 24eea931efee97ef232ec90b081c1208e27b5ae4 authored by Dhruba Borthakur on 25 September 2012, 16:15:32 UTC, committed by Dhruba Borthakur on 25 September 2012, 18:07:01 UTC
Summary:
If ReadCompaction is switched off, then it is better to not even
submit background compaction jobs. I see about 3% increase in
read-throughput on a pure memory database.

Test Plan: run db_bench

Reviewers: heyongqiang

Reviewed By: heyongqiang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D5673
1 parent 26e0ecb
History
File Mode Size
block.cc -rw-r--r-- 7.9 KB
block.h -rw-r--r-- 1.0 KB
block_builder.cc -rw-r--r-- 3.6 KB
block_builder.h -rw-r--r-- 1.7 KB
filter_block.cc -rw-r--r-- 3.3 KB
filter_block.h -rw-r--r-- 2.2 KB
filter_block_test.cc -rw-r--r-- 3.6 KB
format.cc -rw-r--r-- 5.2 KB
format.h -rw-r--r-- 3.1 KB
iterator.cc -rw-r--r-- 1.7 KB
iterator_wrapper.h -rw-r--r-- 2.0 KB
merger.cc -rw-r--r-- 4.8 KB
merger.h -rw-r--r-- 867 bytes
table.cc -rw-r--r-- 8.0 KB
table_builder.cc -rw-r--r-- 8.9 KB
table_test.cc -rw-r--r-- 24.3 KB
two_level_iterator.cc -rw-r--r-- 4.6 KB
two_level_iterator.h -rw-r--r-- 1.2 KB

back to top