https://github.com/mupq/pqm4
Revision 60e418f5158b880fe3f05493bcbc4f06c81515d8 authored by Matthias J. Kannwischer on 05 September 2019, 12:13:32 UTC, committed by Matthias J. Kannwischer on 05 September 2019, 12:23:31 UTC
there seems to be a small mistake in our previous SPHINCS+ results. For sphincs-haraka-192s-robust the cycle count for key gen and signing was the same which doesn't make sense. When re-running the benchmarks I got vastly different numbers. This must have been a glitch during the previous benchmarks.
1 parent be0c421
Tip revision: 60e418f5158b880fe3f05493bcbc4f06c81515d8 authored by Matthias J. Kannwischer on 05 September 2019, 12:13:32 UTC
fix sphincs-haraka-192s-robust benchmarks
fix sphincs-haraka-192s-robust benchmarks
Tip revision: 60e418f
convert_benchmarks.py
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import sys
from mupq import mupq
def usage():
print("Usage: python3 convert_benchmarks.py csv|md")
sys.exit(1)
if __name__ == "__main__":
if len(sys.argv) != 2:
usage()
if sys.argv[1] == "csv":
converter = mupq.CsvConverter()
elif sys.argv[1] == "md":
converter = mupq.MarkdownConverter()
else:
usage()
converter.convert()
Computing file changes ...