Revision c174e6d6979a04b7b77b93f244396be4b81f8bfb authored by Dmitry Monakhov on 27 August 2014, 22:40:00 UTC, committed by Theodore Ts'o on 27 August 2014, 22:40:00 UTC
After commit f282ac19d86f we use different transactions for preallocation and i_disksize update which result in complain from fsck after power-failure. spotted by generic/019. IMHO this is regression because fs becomes inconsistent, even more 'e2fsck -p' will no longer works (which drives admins go crazy) Same transaction requirement applies ctime,mtime updates testcase: xfstest generic/019 Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
1 parent 69dc953
