Revision efee984c27b67e3ebef40410f35671997441b57c authored by Al Viro on 28 April 2012, 06:04:15 UTC, committed by Al Viro on 01 June 2012, 16:58:52 UTC
Does block_sigmask() + tracehook_signal_handler(); called when sigframe has been successfully built. All architectures converted to it; block_sigmask() itself is gone now (merged into this one). I'm still not too happy with the signature, but that's a separate story (IMO we need a structure that would contain signal number + siginfo + k_sigaction, so that get_signal_to_deliver() would fill one, signal_delivered(), handle_signal() and probably setup...frame() - take one). Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
1 parent 17440f1
